beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2013.11.07 2013고단1128 (1)

사기

Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

D On September 20, 2012, the Seoul Central District Court sentenced the defendant A to imprisonment with prison labor for the crime of forging official documents, etc. on September 20, 201, and on November 22, 201, the defendant A was notified of a summary order of a fine of five million won as a crime of fraud in Ansan Branch of the Suwon District Court on November 22, 201.

On September 2009, in purchasing Seo-gu Incheon apartment 206 Dong102, the Defendants conspired to obtain a loan from the bank after receiving a request from the F to request the nominal purchaser of the above apartment from the F to purchase the above apartment in the name of another person by credit bad trading partner, and by receiving a request from the F to purchase the above apartment in the name of another person, the Defendants listed G as the nominal lender, and submitted a false business registration document in the name of G, and let the seller of the above apartment to obtain a guarantee from the bank.

The Defendants, around September 29, 2009, had F enter into a sales contract for the said apartment complex with G as the buyer, and Defendant D introduced G through H and I around October 12, 2009. On October 15, 2009, after having G open the agricultural bank account in its name and received it from G around October 15, 2009.

After October 15, 2009, the Defendants filed a business loan of KRW 227 million with the above apartment as security at the victim Solomon Savings Bank Seoul Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and filed a business registration certificate with KJ located in Gwanak-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, where the above G would have received a loan and repaid the loan to the person in charge of Solomon Savings Bank.

However, the fact that G submitted false documents as if it operated K in order to obtain a loan even though G had been living in a old-age without a certain occupation, and there was no intention or ability to repay the loan.

From October 16, 2009, the Defendants deceptioned the victims, thereby deducting 12,530,000,000 won from the existing loans to the above apartment around October 16, 2009, the remaining KRW 101,703,053 from the victims.