If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

On January 15, 2013, at around 00:50, the Defendant reported 112 as the Defendant refused to refund accommodation charges because he had been accommodated in the “D” room 202 in Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-gun, a business owner, E, who was living in the guest room 202.

The Defendant, upon receiving the report 112, demanded that G be refunded accommodation charges to the police officer, who is a police officer of the Ulsan Police Station, who belongs to the Ulsan Police Station, sent out after receiving the report. However, the above case was explained to be within the jurisdiction of the Gu office, not the police officer, and the above case was attempted to be explained to be the defect that the case was under the jurisdiction of the Gu office, and considered him to have his subordinate rank and rank.

Accordingly, the Defendant assaulted G who is a public official in charge of duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness E, G and H;

1. Each police statement of G, H and E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs on crime scene;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.