손해배상(기)
1. The part against the plaintiff corresponding to the money ordered to be paid under the judgment of the court of first instance shall be revoked.
The defendant.
1. The reasons why the court of first instance should explain this case are as follows. Since the court of first instance suffered a total of 25,363,407 won (=25,363,407 won 11,870,400 won) from No. 19,646,462 won (=25,363,407 won - 3,000 won - 2,716,945 won - 2,716,945 won) from No. 3 of the judgment of the court of first instance, the defendant asserts that "the plaintiff should pay damages from the above damages from 25,648,779 won" and "the plaintiff should pay damages from the above damages from 25,67,40,000 won to the court of first instance" and "the plaintiff should pay damages from the court of first instance to the court of first instance" and "the plaintiff's opinion of first instance to the court of first instance" should be further stated in the plaintiff's grounds for appeal.
2. In light of the circumstances that can be seen by comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the arguments in the statements in the evidence Nos. 1, 14, and Nos. 1, 14, and 1 through 7, namely, the circumstance that the Plaintiff, who was a partner, and the Defendant, were dispatched to the police officer as a result of collective confrontations between the Plaintiff and the Defendant, who was a partner in relation to the scambling, the background leading up to the instant accident, the degree of injury suffered by the Plaintiff, and the subsequent actions, it is reasonable to limit the Defendant’s responsibility to 60% in light of the purport of the damage compensation system, namely, the fair allocation of damages.
(4) According to the above facts of recognition of consolation money, the defendant of this case.