On the other hand, the plaintiff A was in moving a G vehicle driven by the F driver F (hereinafter "the plaintiff's vehicle"). The above vehicle first entered the intersection at the same time as the same time and was in the right direction from the string distance to the front line.

However, D met the right side of the Plaintiff’s vehicle by failing to perform his duty of care to ensure safe operation and check the front and rear left left well at the place where on-and-off lights are installed.

(B) Evidence No. 2-1, 2, 13, hereinafter “instant accident”). The Defendant is an insurer who entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with respect to the Defendant vehicle, and the Plaintiff B and C are the children of the Plaintiff A.

(A) Except as otherwise expressly stated above, there is no dispute, and according to the fact that the purport of the entire pleadings is established, the defendant is liable to compensate the damages suffered by the plaintiffs as the insurer of the defendant vehicle due to the accident in this case.

However, according to the above evidence, if the driver of the plaintiff's vehicle was to drive through the intersection without traffic control, the plaintiff's duty of care to drive safely by examining whether the vehicle was to enter the intersection. Thus, there is no negligence in relation to the accident of this case.

However, the signal, etc. in the direction of the Defendant vehicle was on-and-off, and the signal, etc. in the direction of the Plaintiff vehicle was on-and-off (No. 2, 5, 6). The Plaintiff vehicle appears to have first entered the intersection of the accident place (No. 1, No. 2, No. 2, No. 7, No. 11), and the Defendant vehicle.