When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

At around 19:30 on April 14, 2015, the Defendant divided one another in order to resolve the remainder of real estate with the victim E (the age of 73) in a restaurant of “D”, which is located in C, and the Defendant heard from the victim the phrase “I am hyp. according to the law,” “I am hyp. according to the law,” “I am hyp. according to the law,” “I am back the victim’s face at two to three times after I am am hyp., I am back the victim’s head, am hyp, and am hyp.,” “I am back the victim’s head,” “I am hyp., and am hyp.,” and “I am hyp.,” and “I am hyp.,” and am hyp.

As a result, the defendant suffered damage to the victim, such as snow grass and snow around the snow that require treatment for about two weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Part of the protocol of interrogation of the police against the accused (including E and F large part);

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Each internal investigation report and recording record;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of penalties;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.