An applicant for compensation shall be dismissed.

On October 21, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 06:45 on October 21, 2017, the victim B (the age of 34) was laid down on the ground that the victim B (the age of 34) was slick down in Pyeongtaek-si C; (b) the victim’s face was 3 times by hand; and (c) the victim’s face was collected, which is a dangerous object on the tables, and then the victim’s head was removed, and then the victim’s face was taken once again.

As a result, the defendant carried dangerous articles and inflicted injury on the victim, such as recognition on the right side and stove, which require treatment for about 28 days.

On November 30, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 08:30 on November 30, 2017, 2017, the Defendant: (b) laid off the front of the GMW car, which was parked in the front parking lot of Pyeongtaek-si apartment commercial building, with the front of the GMW car owned by the victim F, and damaged that the sum of the repair cost, such as the front glass and Bos replacement, is worth KRW 2,832,973.

Summary of Evidence

"2017 Highest 2160"

1. Entry of the defendant in part of the trial records first and third times;

1. Legal statement of the witness B;

1. The suspect interrogation protocol of the police as to B;

1. A investigation report (CCTV image);

1. A photograph of a CCTV closure;

1. A medical certificate;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel asserted that, while the defendant's face with the victim's face was humped and the head of the victim was humped, the victim's injury was caused by self-injury of the victim.

In full view of the evidence duly adopted and examined by this Court and the following facts, the above assertion by the defendant and his defense counsel is not acceptable, since the special injury crime of this case is sufficiently proven.

1. There was no fact that the victim does self-harm at the time of the instant case, and when the Defendant gets the head of the victim due to his own illness, the victim is a sentry.