Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one million won shall be the one day.

1. On May 16, 2020, at around 05:40, the injured Defendant was aware of the victim C (the age of 65) parked on the street B prior to the Jeju-si on May 16, 202, that the said victim would take a bath during the Defendant’s mother’s currency due to the lack of taxi fares, and the said victim was able to take a bath while the Defendant was in the Defendant’s mother’s currency, and the said victim was able to take care of the inside of the said victim who was seated in the driver’s seat at one time as a raw water, and the said victim was able to take care of the two weeks after the escape of the said victim from the said taxi and walking twice along the right side of the said victim’s length.

2. The Defendant destroyed property damage by drinking away the glass of a building that had been located there on the street with the time and time set forth in paragraph (1), thereby damaging the glass window equivalent to 30,000 won at the market price owned by the victim E (37 years of age) and 59,840 won at the market price.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement made by the defendant in this court;

1. Partial statement of the suspect interrogation protocol of the defendant prepared by the police;

1. Statement made by the police officer C on the statement; and

1. Entry of the E-document;

1. Each investigation report (including attached documents) on police preparation, each statement of the amount of damage caused by property destruction and attaching related images, etc., and images (including attached documents);

1. Entry of a report processing list of 112 reported cases prepared by the police;

1. Statement of a general diagnosis document to C in preparation of doctor F; and

1. Application of each of the related visual Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act (Selection of Fines) and Article 366 of the Criminal Act;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act (Aggravation of concurrent crimes with punishment determined in a heavier judgment);

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is the order of provisional payment.