beta
(영문) 부산지방법원 2012.12.27 2012노2786

성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반등

Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The Defendant did not have arranged sexual traffic through a entertainment loan in a singing practice room operated by the Defendant.

B. Even if it is not an unreasonable sentencing decision, the lower court’s sentencing (a fine of five million won) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. As to the assertion of mistake of facts, the following circumstances revealed by the court below and the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, namely, ① the Defendant’s contact loan from the investigative agency to the court below, and the Defendant stated that the Defendant would create a sexual relationship if the customer wishes, and that the Defendant was ordered to receive the location map of the mixed Sea to be used at the time of sexual intercourse. ② The mixed Sea Sea, which the Defendant was in possession at the time of the instant case, was the same as the mixed Sea, which was in the waiting room of the instant singing practice room (the Defendant was the Defendant, as soon as it was in the waiting room, and the combined Sea, which was in the said singing room, not the Defendant’s own, but the Defendant was operated at the instant singing room, and the Defendant, who was playing at the instant singing room, was not the Defendant’s seat at the time of this case’s singing practice room, and the Defendant, who was in the instant case’s singing room, was not able to have been able to have been able to have been able to have been able to have been able to have been able to have only the Defendant 5 years of this case’s.