However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On 14:40 on 29:20 on 29:1, 2013, the Defendant, in front of the Daejeon Seongbuk-gu B building, brought a dispute with the victim C (50 years of age) in terms of a claim and obligation, at one time the victim’s speed was frighted.

As a result, the victim suffered damage to the above victim's focused brain damage with the focus of the detailed uncertainty that there is no open room for treatment for about six weeks by causing the victim to be faced with the head of the above part of the floor.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of each police statement about D and C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Articles 262 and 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the choice of punishment;

1. Suspension of execution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (including the fact that the victim does not want the punishment for the defendant by mutual consent with the victim, the victim does not have the same criminal records, the circumstances of the crime, family relationship, etc.);