However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On November 6, 2016, at around 23:20, the Defendant reported that there was a person who would be a disturbance in the “C” restaurant located in Yongcheon-si B, and asked the circumstances of the case by the police officer belonging to the police station of the Gyeongcheon-gu Police Station that called “I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, and I am at one time.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers related to criminal investigation.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of E and F;

1. The arrest report of the occurrence of the case, the detailed statement of processing the 112 reported case, investigation report (the counter investigation of the owner of the C cafeteria business), the application of the statutes governing the place of service;

1. Relevant Articles 136(1) and 136(1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of imprisonment;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution [Scope of Recommendation] The main reason for sentencing is that the scope of mitigation area (one to eight months), mitigation area (one to eight months), assault, intimidation, and deceptive scheme is minor. [Determination of sentence] The defendant is divided by mistake; the defendant was punished twice for violent crimes; the punishment was not imposed as violent crimes for the last ten years; the degree of assault is relatively minor.