1. On August 24, 2013, the Defendant sent the victim an e-mail with the content that “The Defendant would not know about suicide even once in Daegu Family Department,” on the ground that he received a separate notice from the victim B (n, 31 years of age) on August 24, 2013, and threatened the victim by sending the victim the e-mail, “The Defendant would be committing suicide only once in Daegu Family Department.”

2. On August 31, 2013, the Defendant: (a) received a separate notice from the victim on August 23:17, 2013; (b) was chosen from September 201 through September 201 through September 201; and (c) for the next 10 years thereafter, the Defendant did not have a strong word.

(g) Hegs;

Dr. Nices and students’ students’ students’ students’ students’ students. Now is the last one.

If the telephone text does not do so so so so, it will be safe to do so.

The latter shall not be followed.

‘The text message sent to the victim' and the victim threatened the victim.

2. The facts charged in the instant case constitute an offense falling under Article 311 of the Criminal Act, which can be prosecuted only when the victim files a complaint under Article 312(1) of the Criminal Act.

However, according to the written agreement bound in the trial records, it is recognized that the victim cancelled the complaint against the defendant on December 5, 2013, which was after the prosecution of this case. Thus, the prosecution of this case is dismissed pursuant to Article 327 subparagraph 5 of the Criminal Procedure Act.