When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On February 7, 2017, at around 00 00:00, the Defendant marb, within a taxi operated by the victim C (59 years of age) who arrived at the front of the “B building” on the front road, she she was gleep and she was flicked by the victim. In such case, she was flicked of why the victim was she was flick at the inside

“........” The payment of the fee and the demand for the discharge did not bring about about about 20 parts of the taxi.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate duties of the victim's taxi operation by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the notification of taxi fares receipt and the report of 112 case;

1. Article 314 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;