Seized evidence 1 to 5 shall be confiscated.

The defendant.

The telecommunications financial fraud organization is an organization that commits the phishing fraud under the so-called Bosing Act by deceiving a large number of unspecified persons to collect deposits, etc. or seizes them by misrepresenting himself/herself to a financial institution or investigation agency while operating a call center in a foreign country, such as China. The organization is operated in the form of an organization by sharing its role as the organization, such as the so-called “inducing” that solicits many unspecified victims by telephone, etc. for the commission of the crime, the “inducing” that solicits a large number of unspecified victims to commit the crime,” the “invitation” that solicits a large number of unspecified victims to be used for the crime, the “invitation” that withdraws and delivers the cash deposited in a large passbook, and the “invitation” that actually plans and instructs the crime.

On September 2018, the Defendant reported the job offer advertisement in C Messen and received cash in contact with the name influence, which is the cause of the organization of telecommunications financial fraud, and agreed to receive about KRW 100,000 per day and KRW 300,000 per case in return, and decided to take charge of the role of delivering the cash withdrawn under the direction of the name in his name in return for the receipt of the cash withdrawn to another person. On the contrary, D, E, F, etc. received the money withdrawn by the victim and sent the money withdrawn by the victim to the telecommunications financial fraud organization or to monitor the situation of the place of withdrawal, and subsequently, conspired with the name in order to commit the phishing fraud.

On September 7, 2018, at a place where the location of around 17:00 on September 17, 2018 is unknown, the name infinite who is responsible for the incentive for the telecommunications financial fraud organization, the victim B made a false statement to the victim B through the victim B’s H Stockholm stating, “I would like to have the son who is going to go to her home with money if I want to do so, I would like to deliver her home to the sender who would go to her home,” and the victim would withdraw cash, D, and E.