When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On January 23, 2016, the Defendant: (a) operated a taxi (E) operated by the Defendant on the front side of the Do government-Si of the Gyeonggi-si, Gyeonggi-do on January 23, 2016, with the victim F (F, 25 years of age) aboard the taxi (E) operated by the Defendant, and received the victim’s call.

In this context, the victim asked d., "I will not be paid a fee," and the victim rejected it, and the knee knee Park was opened and opened a back of the kneb and the knee kneb for the victim's bridge to be treated for about 14 days.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness F and G;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. 112 Notice of reported records;

1. The defendant asserts that CCTV CDs and photographs [the defendant did not assault the victim's bridge on his/her own.]

그러나 이 법원이 적법하게 채택하여 조사한 증거들에 의하여 인정되는 사정들, 즉 ① 피해자는 수사기관 및 이 법정에서 일관하여 피고인이 자신의 오른쪽 종아리 바깥 부분을 발로 찼다고

The witness G, which was present at the time of the instant case, had been present in this court that the Defendant had observed the right bridge part of the victim's right side due to his appearance in this court.

(3) In full view of the fact that, even if the CCTV images at the time of the instant case were based on the CCTV images, it is sufficiently recognized that the Defendant used to assault the victim who was seated in the back seat of the driver’s seat, etc. by launchinging the victim’s bridge.

또 한, 변호인은 피고인이 피해자의 종아리를 발로 찼다고

If we argue that knee-gnee-gnee-gnee-gne, such as the injury diagnosis statement, or that the degree of holeing on the damaged part does not constitute injury.

However, after the instant case, the victim was knee-knene, but kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne