도로법위반
The defendant shall be innocent.
1. At around 19:39 on February 28, 2002, the Defendant violated the Defendant’s vehicle operation restriction by operating the Defendant’s employees at a point of 13.6 km in the direction of the Seoul Northern Highway, which exceeds 10t of the Defendant’s vehicle loading weight limit exceeding 12.3t and 45.37t of freight exceeding 40t of the Defendant’s C vehicle loading capacity.
2. The Constitutional Court rendered a decision of unconstitutionality on the portion of Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4920, Jan. 5, 1995; Act No. 7832, Dec. 30, 2005; Act No. 7832, Oct. 28, 2010; Act No. 8315, Oct. 28, 2010; Act No. 8665, Oct. 28, 2010; Act No. 4920, Jan. 5, 2095; Act No. 7832, Dec. 30, 2005; Act No. 4777, Jan. 2, 2005; Act No. 83155, Oct. 2, 200) that “if an agent, employee, or other employee of a corporation commits an offense under Article 83(1)2,
3. According to the conclusion, the facts charged in this case constitute a case that does not constitute a crime, and thus, is acquitted under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act