2. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, namely, ① the victim was found to have suffered injuries from the victim's hand in the vehicle from the investigative agency to the court of the court below, and ② the victim was found to have suffered injuries from the victim's hand in the front left hand of the vehicle, without permission of the victim's hand, and the defendant's hand in the front left hand of the vehicle and closed the door. During this process, the court below made a detailed and consistent statement to the effect that the defendant's hand hand over of the victim's left hand, etc. up to the victim's hand, and ② the defendant did not properly memory the victim's hand over while suffering from injuries from the victim's hand, etc. at the investigative agency, but it is hard to find the facts that the defendant suffered injuries from the victim's hand over at the time, and the defendant's statement to the effect that it is difficult to recognize the defendant's hand over the victim's hand over the victim's hand over the victim's hand, etc.

3. If so, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.