면접교섭
2016 Doz. 4222 Interview
A (1968 People's Republic of Korea, South
Busan Address
Busan place of service
B. (1970s.......)
Busan Address
A person shall be appointed.
same as the other party to the address.
November 20, 2017
1. The appellant's appeal of this case is dismissed.
2. The cost of a trial shall be borne by each person.
The claimant shall be entitled to reply to the principal of the case at the place that the claimant wants from 00 to 06:0 on the fourth day of the week demand: from 00 to 00 on the following day. The other party shall cooperate with the claimant so that the visitation right of the principal of the case can only be achieved, and shall not interfere with it.
After the divorce with the other party, the claimant is not able to confirm the principal of the case from now to now. On the other hand, the claimant seeks visitation rights as stated in the purport of the claim.
The following circumstances are acknowledged by the overall purport of the examination of this case, family investigation, and examination. ① The petitioner has been hospitalized or has received outpatient treatment from around 2007 to after diagnosis of stimulative disorder. ② During the marriage period between the petitioner and the other party, the principal of this case suffered significant aggressive tendency to the other party and the principal of this case due to aggressive symptoms against the other party and the other party's mental disease, etc., and it seems that the applicant still has a fear to the other party. ③ The principal of this case is prone to the interview. Since the applicant's request for the interview right trial of this case, the applicant does not want the interview with the applicant, and the applicant does not want to have a stability system for the reason that he/she does not want to have an interview with the applicant, ⑤ The applicant does not want to have an interview with the applicant at the present point of time until he/she does not want to have an interview with the applicant, ④ It appears that it is difficult for the applicant to use his/her body for physical treatment for more than 3 months, etc.
Therefore, the appellant's appeal of this case shall be dismissed, and the judgment shall be judged as per Disposition.
Judges Park Sang-sung