2. The judgment of the defendant is recognized that the defendant was scam and faithfully returning hallucinogenic substances to society while scaming all the crime and reflecting the wrongness, and that he agreed with the thief victim.

However, in full view of the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant was sentenced to punishment more than ten times for the same crime; (b) the Defendant committed the instant crime without being aware of the crime even though it was committed a repeated offense; (c) the inhalement of hallucinogenic substances cannot be deemed to be less and less of the quality of the crime in terms of impairing social soundness due to its toxicity; and (d) other circumstances that are conditions for sentencing, such as the Defendant’s health, age, career, and family relationship, the sentence imposed by the lower

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.