However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

around 17:00 on July 3, 2017, the Defendant appeared in the Seoul Southern District Court No. 404, Seoul Southern District Court No. 386 on July 3, 201 to take an oath as a witness and was notified of the right to refuse to testify.

On September 29, 2012, the Defendant did not have any indication in the column of the issue of the C apartment expense ledger stating that “I will not put up every 50th 50th lux 2 Blux 2 Blux 3,” and that “I will not put up (influor 2) to the 2th lux 30,” and entered “I will not put up (influor 2) to the 2nd 2nd 2nd 3rd 3rd 3rd 200,” despite the fact that the Defendant entered “I will not put up the 1st 2nd 4th 2nd 3th 3th 3th 200

He stated “I” in the interrogation of the defense counsel “I” as “each 50 notice to the 2th carbon occupant.”

2. Whether there exists a false testimony as follows: (a) whether there is a habiting fact that “I will not attach an unexplosion” in the column of the occurrence of work in the guard ledger;

Dried Lymana

It is essential that “not attaching” was done in the examination of the counsel.

The testimony was made falsely, and the testimony was made falsely in the interrogation of the defense counsel called “A.”, “A.” and “A.,” stating that there was no fact of “the commencement of a public notice board”.

Accordingly, the defendant appeared as a witness and made a false statement contrary to his memory.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness D, E, F, and G;

1. Copy of the protocol concerning the examination of suspect by the prosecution against the accused (No. 23 of the list of evidence);

1. Copy of the protocol concerning the examination of suspect of the accused;

1. Court rulings (Seoul Southern District Court Decision 2014No. 2023 dated 2023), non-prosecution decision (Seoul Southern District Court Decision 2015No. 25347 dated September 29, 2012, changed private documents, etc.), work in the security ledger (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2014No. 4021 Decided September 201), A’s witness examination protocol (Seoul Southern District Court Decision 2014No. 2023 dated September 20, 201), and A’s trial protocol (Seoul Southern District Court Decision 2016No. 4021 order).