beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.12.12 2017나20271

손해배상(자)

Text

1. All appeals by the defendant against the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court of the first instance’s explanation concerning this case is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance, except in the following cases. Thus, it is citing this as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The part to be mard;

A. Under the third side of the judgment of the court of first instance, the defendant asserts that the deceased did not die due to the accident of this case, but that the deceased died due to cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

In full view of the evidence No. 4, evidence No. 9-15, evidence No. 9-15, evidence No. 15 of the first instance court’s order to submit each document to the Director General of the National Health Insurance Corporation and the Director General of the Daejeon Regional Headquarters of the National Health Insurance Corporation, the deceased was sent to J Hospital after the instant accident. In full view of the purport of the arguments as a result of the fact-finding on the deceased’s medical record, the deceased’s medical record No. 4 was stated as follows: “I am in a orchard, and am in an emergency room” and “the deceased’s condition was scarping out,” and “I am in an emergency room at the time of the instant accident, and am in an emergency room at the time of the instant accident.” At the time of the instant accident, I did not look at the back wheels of the instant accident, but did not look at the deceased’s sound at the time of the accident, and the Plaintiff was at the age of 7 months of the instant accident without any special direction at the time of the accident.