A. As to KRW 55,550,310 and KRW 55,309,660 among Defendant A, Defendant A shall be from June 11, 2014 to August 31, 2015.

A. As to the facts as to the reasons for the claim, the aforementioned Defendants were deemed to have been led to the confession of the Defendants because they did not clearly dispute them. Since the Plaintiff and the Defendant B may be recognized by comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the entries and pleadings between the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff, the Defendant A shall pay 5,50,310 won, such as indemnity, and 55,309,60 won, which is the date of subrogation, from June 11, 2014 to August 31, 2015, the agreed interest rate of 12% per annum from the following day to February 11, 2016, which is the date of delivery of a copy of the complaint of this case, to 15% per annum from the following day to 15% per annum, and from the next day to 20,500 won per annum from the date of full payment, to 15% per annum of 165% per annum from the date of delivery of the complaint of this case to 2016.

B. On this point, Defendant B heard that no damage has occurred from Defendant D, who is the land owner, consented to the preparation of the pre-sale contract under the name of Defendant A, and acknowledged the fact of concluding the pre-sale contract on the confirmation telephone of the lending staff. Defendant B asserted to the effect that there was no public offering by recognizing the instant fraud loan and recognizing that there was no profit since it immediately deposited KRW 60,000,000 from his own account to Defendant A.

l.p. g., p.