When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

From July 18, 2017 to July 20, 2017, the Defendant is a person who works as a assistant to G of an electrical engineer employed by the victim F who re-subcontracted the electrical construction part from the subcontractor company of the said construction company, E, a subcontractor company of the said construction company, as the re-subcontracted company, at the reconstruction site of “D Borrowing” performed by Songpa-gu C (State) located in Songpa-gu.

1. On July 22, 2017, from around 12:00 to around 17:00 of the same day, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s work of electrical input and follow-up work by force by cutting off electric wires 4 rolls installed in electric wires installed by the damaged person in order to measure the first floor of the building at the construction site, from around 12:00 to around 17:00 of the same day, on the ground that the victim F used the victim’s payment of wages to the Defendant’s above 3rd party.

2. The Defendant destroyed the property owned by the victim by cutting the total amount of 28 2,414,00 won of the 28 roll market value of electric wires owned by the victim F at the time and place specified in paragraph 1.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness G;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. A H statement;

1. An investigation report (in the case concerned with the victim F re-verification), each investigation report (in relation to F submitted data), and investigation report (in the case of letters presented by F), respectively;

1. Screening pictures by capturing a mobile phone call;

1. The screen of a letter message sent by the wife of the victim to G her wife after capturing the message;

1. In light of the following circumstances, the Defendant and the defense counsel’s assertion against the investigation report (the results of digital evidence analysis) and CDs (in light of the following circumstances acknowledged according to each of the evidence in the judgment, it is sufficient to find the Defendant guilty of the facts charged in the instant case

(1) G has become well known to the defendant during the period from the investigative agency to the date of this court.

“I see that I am a horse.”

was stated.

G on the background of hearing the above speech from the defendant, the situation at the time, and the situation before and after the time.