However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On November 29, 2015, around 05:30, the Defendant: (a) 112 reported on the roads near the Geum-gu, Busan in order to “the Sifin in connection with the taxi expenses” on the ground that the police officer D belonging to the District Police Agency of the Busan in order to listen to the reported contents and would only resolve the dispute with the taxi engineer to himself/herself, and (b) the Defendant told the said D to the effect that he/she would be able to smoothly resolve the dispute with the taxi engineer.

“In doing so, the body part of the above D was tightly pushed down with the hand hand and the ship, and the cell phone with the cell phone in hand was used as the hand, and was assaulted with the view to harming the face part of the above D.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of 112 report by police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to E and D;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (a certain degree of violation, degree of damage, etc.)