beta
(영문) 대구지방법원김천지원 2020.05.07 2019가단4584

대여금

Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 43,00,000 as well as 30% per annum from November 30, 2007 to July 14, 2014 to the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. A claim for the interruption of the extinctive prescription of a claim based on the payment order (which became final and conclusive October 31, 2009) in a loan payment order in the Daegu District Court, Daegu District Court, Kimcheon-si, 2009j2441, which was rendered against the defendant by the plaintiff to indicate

2. Judgment by public notice for recognition (Article 208 (3) 3 of the Civil Procedure Act).