B. On November 14, 2012, 2012, the Defendant filed a lawsuit against the Nonparty, who is the wife, to divorce, consolation money, custodian, and person with parental authority (hereinafter “related case”), and “1. The Plaintiff and the Defendant are divorced. The Plaintiff and the Defendant dismissed the Plaintiff’s claim for consolation money on June 24, 2014.” The appellate court filed a counterclaim and proceeded with the ruling of recommending reconciliation as of February 19, 2016.

【Ground of recognition】 The fact that there is no dispute, Gap’s 1, 2, Gap’s 5-1, 2, and 8, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The plaintiff alleged that the plaintiff remitted 22,190,000 won to the defendant who was the plaintiff who was the plaintiff's action (i.e., KRW 16,570,220,000) to the non-party who was his/her father and the non-party who was the defendant's wife. However, the defendant claimed that the non-party should pay 2,219,000 won and delay damages to the defendant for each conjunctive tort, and that the plaintiff should pay 2,219,000 won and delay damages to the non-party on November 26, 2007, KRW 10,000,000, and KRW 300,000,000,000 to the non-party on January 9, 2008, the defendant did not have any obligation to return it to the non-party as the plaintiff's words sent to the non-party on each ancillary tort.

B. On March 21, 2011, the Nonparty (i) is the Nonparty’s wife on March 21, 201.