A A Fines 1,00,000 won, Defendant B’s fine 1,000,000 won, and Defendant C’s fine 50,000 won, respectively.

Defendant

B and C are one-way and not known to Defendant A.

1. Defendant A and C around November 21, 2012, around 21:40, on the grounds that the Defendant, who performed drinking in the chill house located in Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F, was able to make a claim on the grounds that the Defendant, who performed drinking in the cream, was slick, was slick, while drinking in the chill house located in Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

In front of the above restaurant, the Defendant carried the victim B (the 60 years of age, the f0)’s flab, and carried the part of the victim’s flab in drinking.

As a result, the Defendant inflicted an injury on the victim on the part of the baby in need of approximately three weeks of medical treatment.

2. Defendant B and C around November 6, 2012, around 21:40, on the ground that the victim A (the 62 years of age, South) who dices alcohol in the catus catherb, while drinking in the catus house located in Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F, she became the victim and the catus.

Defendant

B, in front of the above restaurant at the temporary border, exceeded the verbal part of the victim's blue blue, which was reported by her hand, and her blue at once, the victim's head was her blue, and the defendant C was her flue with her hand, and the defendant C was her flue with her hand.

As a result, the Defendants jointly inflicted bodily injury on the victim for about three weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each injury diagnosis certificate (B, A);

1. Article relevant to the facts constituting an offense and the selection of punishment;

A. Defendant A: Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act; selection of fines

B. Defendant B and C: Article 2(2) and 2(1)3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act, Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of each fine

1. Defendants to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: Defendant B’s defense counsel’s assertion on Defendant B’s defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act does not constitute a crime because the illegality of Defendant B’s crime was excluded as self-defense.