However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On September 21, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of three years on September 29, 2017 by imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of road traffic law (dacting driving), etc. at the Incheon District Court Branch Branch, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on September 29, 2017.

While working in Seo-gu Incheon Metropolitan Government D Operation E, the Defendant received a request from the victim G to trade the said car from the owner of the said passenger car (F) on September 7, 2017, and led the victims to raise money by deceiving the victims as if the transaction took place between the victims.

1. On September 27, 2017, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim D that “A vehicle owner want to sell a benz car and purchased it. I sent a purchase price to the vehicle owner. I send it to the vehicle owner.”

However, the fact that the purchase price was returned to the owner of the vehicle and was thought to be used at will, but there was no intention or ability to normally proceed with the sale of the passenger car at benz.

Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings the victim as above and let the victim transfer KRW 13.5 million to a corporate bank bank account in the name of G as the price for the vehicle on the same day from the victim.

Accordingly, the defendant deceivings the victim and let G receive 13.5 million won from the victim.

2. The Defendant calls the victim G at the same time and place as paragraph 1 and calls the victim G at the same time and place as that of paragraph 1 to re-transfer the price of the said vehicle to B. After taking necessary measures, the Defendant will re-transfer the vehicle after taking necessary measures.

“A false representation was made.”

However, the defendant did not have any intention or ability to return the above price only when he was able to use it for the repayment of his personal debt.

Nevertheless, the defendant deceiving the victim as above and transferred KRW 10,50,000 to a bank account in the name of the defendant's company bank as the name of the victim's return of the vehicle on the same day.

This is the defendant.