특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Defendants are not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the Defendants is publicly announced.
Defendant A is the chief of “D”, which is an information and communications design and consulting company, and Defendant B is the director of “D” as Defendant A’s trading company, and the victim E is the director of “F”.
A. Defendant A1) The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a G SP car in violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (EM).
On October 21, 2014, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol on October 23:5, 2014, driven the car in the above Spo-type, and proceeded with a point 284 km on the Gyeong-gu road in each wing-gu drawing of the Cheongju-si.
At the time of night, the road was slicked, sleeped, and flowed, so in such a case, a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle has a duty of care to drive the motor vehicle safely along the lane by accurately manipulating the steering and brake devices.
그럼에도 피고 인은 위와 같이 술에 취하여 이를 게을리 한 채 그대로 진행한 과실로 1 차로에서 중심을 잃고 미끄러지면서 위 승용차의 전면 부분으로 중앙 분리대를 1차 충격한 후 회전하면서 재차 뒷부분으로 중앙 분리대를 들이받아 위 승용차의 뒷좌석에 탑승하고 있던 피해자 E으로 하여금 위 승용차의 뒷좌석 옆 창문을 통해 차량 밖으로 튕겨 져 나가 중앙 분리대를 넘어 반대편 차도에 떨어지게 하였다.
Ultimately, the Defendant did not take measures such as aiding the victim, even though the Defendant suffered from an injury to the victim, such as blood transfusion by negligence in the course of business as above, and did not leave the victim and the said vehicle, and escaped as it is, and caused the victim to die at the scene, such as low temperature at around 07:50 on October 22, 2014, and low-blood shocks caused by large amounts of transfusion.
2) The Defendant, as described in the above-mentioned 1, is also a person who drinks his car and drinks his car.