beta
(영문) 광주지방법원 2019.12.13 2019나56462

손해배상(기)

Text

1. Of the part against the defendant in the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant exceeding the amount ordered by the following.

Reasons

1. The defendant's grounds for appeal citing the judgment of the court of first instance are not significantly different from the argument in the court of first instance except for the following additional parts, and the fact-finding and judgment of the court of first instance are justified even if all evidence submitted in the court of first instance and the court of first instance

Therefore, the reasoning of the judgment of the court is that the part of the defendant of the judgment of the court of first instance is partially changed as follows, and that of the judgment of the court of first instance is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance except for the additional determination as follows.

The following details are added between the 5th and 3rd. The defendant C Association of the defendant C Association of the defendant C (hereinafter referred to as the "the defendant Association")

(B) A mutual aid agreement which has been established to guarantee liability for damages caused by a broker’s act as a broker and which has become a 100 million won amount of deduction with B (hereinafter “instant mutual aid agreement”).

The sales contract of this case was concluded within the period of mutual aid under the mutual aid agreement of this case. The sales contract of this case was concluded within the period of mutual aid under the mutual aid agreement of this case. The defendant's part among the "scopes of liability for damages" of Eul Nos. 1 and 2 in addition to Eul Nos. 8 through 15 in addition, as follows: 3) The scope of liability for damages (the defendant association) under the mutual aid agreement of the defendant association (the defendant association) and the terms and conditions of mutual aid agreement of the defendant association.

The defendant association may directly claim the payment of the mutual aid money (Article 19(1) of the Mutual Aid Regulations, Article 19(1) of the Terms and Conditions of Mutual Aid), and the defendant association in receipt of the claim shall review the authenticity of the contents of the documents claimed, and pay the amount equivalent to the percentage of the members who subscribed to mutual aid within the limit of the amount of the mutual aid money after deliberation by the Compensation Deliberation Committee (Article 19(2) of the Mutual Aid Regulations, Article 19(2) of the Terms and Conditions of Mutual Aid, and Article 19(2) of the