However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On March 9, 2018, the Defendant: (a) received a letter from the name of the Bosing Financial Fraud Group (hereinafter “B agent”); (b) around that time, the Defendant was given a loan by repeatedly making cash withdrawals; (c) made a loan by telephone; and (d) received a proposal that “on the face of delivery to a person who instructs him/her by finding money deposited in the current account; and (c) received the proposal that “on the face of delivery; and (c) received a loan from the Defendant’s name, and then notified the said B of the number of bank account (C).

However, in fact, the Defendant was aware of the fact that the method of loan, which the Defendant had already received the loan and carried out the loan, was an emergency, and was aware of the fact that the method of loan, which was carried out by the winners of the name, was not an emergency, and that the said “B agency” is an employee of the Bosing Financial Fraud Group.

Then, on March 12, 2018, employees of the Financial Fraud Group, such as the above “B agency,” made a false statement to the effect that the victim E is called F inspection by leaving a telephone from the French land on March 12, 2018, and that “any former account is opened at the G Fraud Group and used as the passbook. If money is deposited in a designated account to confirm the possibility of fraud and crime, if it is not suspected after confirming whether it is illegal, it is paid in addition to the above KRW 2,380,000,000,000,000,000 won should be paid again to the person who was damaged, and then, on December 10:25, 2018, employees of the Financial Fraud Group shall be asked to deliver money from the victim to the person who was designated by the Defendant at the time of withdrawing the money.”