When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

From the early July 2015, the Defendant served as a chief of office in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government to manage the business of “D”.

On December 29, 2015, the Defendant received KRW 100,000, 55,000 as the price for sexual traffic from F and G, which had been a business proprietor, from G, and had employees H and I do sexual intercourse with the above male customers from July 29, 2015 to December 29, 2015.

As a result, the defendant conspired with E to engage in commercial sex acts such as arranging sexual traffic.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of each police suspect against F, G, H, and E;

1. Indicating some of the statements concerning I in the police interrogation protocol;

1. Police seizure records and list of seizure;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes for internal investigation reports (involving advertisements for Internet sexual traffic);

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as Mediation, etc. of Selective Commercial Sex Acts and subordinate statutes concerning criminal facts, Article 30 of the Criminal Act, and selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;