A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for six months and by imprisonment for eight months.

1. Defendant A is a person who operated a telecom with the trade name “D” in Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Building 606, 909, 1203, and 1401.

From February 24, 2016 to March 21, 2016, the Defendant employed E, F, etc. from the above business establishment as a female employee, and received 10,000 won from male customers who were unable to find an Internet advertisement and received 80,000 won from 80,000 won to 10,000 won as a consideration for sexual traffic, and arranged sexual traffic by allowing them to sexual intercourse with female employees.

2. Defendant B, from August 2015 to October 2, 2015, controlled the fact that he operated a sexual traffic business establishment under the trade name “G” in the Seoul Mapo-gu Seoul building, and received a summary order of KRW 5 million as a fine for a violation of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as Intermediating Commercial Sex Acts (e.g., brokerage of sexual traffic) at the Seoul Western District Court on January 27, 2016.

When the defendant puts down a commercial sex acts as above, he suggested A to operate the said commercial sex acts and suggested A to operate the said commercial sex acts as referred to in paragraph (1), and even with well-known knowledge that A is conducting commercial sex acts, he/she conducted commercial sex acts such as arranging commercial sex acts by subleting the said commercial sex acts to A total of KRW 700,000,000 per month of Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Building 606, 909, 1203, and 1401, respectively, which he/she rents to A.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. The protocol concerning the interrogation of the Defendants to the prosecution

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of each police suspect against F and E;

1. Monthly tax contract for each officetel;

1. The criminal place;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (on-site photographs, etc.);

1. The Defendants of the relevant law regarding criminal facts: Article 19(2)1 of the Act on the Punishment, etc. of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, and the public prosecutor of the portion of forfeiture of imprisonment selective for the punishment of the Defendant’s imprisonment has been punished by forfeiture against the Defendant A; however, the Defendant’s failure to sentence forfeiture due to lack of evidence to specify the profits gained by arranging sexual traffic.

The reason for sentencing.