However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On January 20, 2013, at around 19:25, the Defendant: (a) driven a motor vehicle with c Getroke in the state of alcohol concentration of 0.169%; (b) while driving a motor vehicle with two lanes in front of the Geum River Hospital in the Chang-dong, Changcheon-si, the Defendant had a duty of care to safely drive the motor vehicle by securing a necessary distance from the front side to the front side of the Sincheon-si, the speed 30km. In such cases, at the time, a vehicle was in the atmosphere with signal signal at the time of the front side, so a person engaged in driving duties should not drive the motor vehicle while it is difficult to drive the motor vehicle normally under the influence of alcohol; and (c) when following the motor vehicle behind the motor vehicle traveling in the same direction, the Defendant has a duty of care to safely drive the motor vehicle by driving the motor vehicle before and after the front side and the right side.

Nevertheless, the Defendant was unable to drive normally due to the influence of drinking, such as being red on the inside of the inside, and was negligent in neglecting the front time while making it difficult to drive normally due to the influence of drinking, and did not discover the E-W motor vehicle of the victim D(32 years old) waiting in the signal signal at the front direction, and did not discover the E-W motor vehicle in the front direction, and continued to receive the back part of the Defendant’s front-hand part of the vehicle. While the said E-W motor vehicle continues to be sealed in the future, the said E-W motor vehicle was driven by the victim F (32 years old) drive in the front-hand part of the said E-W vehicle while stopping in the front direction.

Ultimately, the Defendant’s occupational negligence caused the above victim D to undergo a treatment for approximately three weeks, and caused the victim H (the victim H (the 31 year old) who is a passenger of the said passenger car to undergo a treatment for a approximately two-day period of time, and caused the victim I (the 32 year old), the same passenger I (the son, the son, and the son) to undergo a treatment for a approximately two-day period of time, and caused the victim J (the son, the son, the son), who is the same passenger, to undergo a treatment for a approximately two-day period of time.