2. Even when considering the following facts: (a) the Defendant led to the confession and reflect of each of the crimes of this case; (b) some damaged items are returned or returned; (c) there is no record of punishment for the same kind of crime in the past; and (d) when the judgment becomes final and conclusive, each of the crimes of this case committed larceny by repeatedly intrusion upon another person’s residence, etc. over 16 times, and the nature of the crime is not very good in light of the law, frequency, contents, etc. of the crime; (c) the total amount of damage is not limited to KRW 21 million; (d) there is no agreement with the victims up to the trial; and (e) there is no substantial damage recovery; and (e) the Defendant committed each of the crimes of this case during the period of probation due to the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes; and (e) there is no record of punishment for the same kind of crime; and (e) the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, family relationship, motive and circumstance of the crime; and (e) the Defendant’s argument for sentencing is unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.