However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a D Myti-viol.

Around 10:30 on August 30, 2012, the Defendant driven a fluort car and got left to the left of the front of the Simsan-gu Geumsan-si Yangsan-si in order to turn to the left of the front of the Simsan-si in the area of the Namyangsan-do Center.

Since a crosswalk is installed, in this case, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to check whether there is a person who gets a crosswalk by checking well the right and the right and the right of the crosswalk, and to drive safely.

Nevertheless, by negligence, the Defendant neglected this and proceeded with the victim E (n.e., 28 years of age) who dried the above-mentioned crosswalk as is, the Defendant suffered bodily injury, such as the victim’s flaging blood in light of the light-to-face in which there is no open room for a six-month hospitalization and additional medical treatment, and then, the victim suffered bodily injury, such as an unknown blaging-to-face-to-face transfusion, a detailed prop-to-face-to-face transfusion, and an open address.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A report on the occurrence of a traffic accident and a report on actual condition investigation;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents concerning Criminal Facts, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, the selection of imprisonment without prison labor;

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act on the Suspension of Execution (Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution) (Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution (Article 62(1) of the Act on the Honorable Treatment of Victims, which is agreed with the Victims, and on April 23, 2013), such as the fact that the

1. The order of the community service order is issued on the grounds that the defendant is more severe than a certain period of time in order for the defendant to return to a sound social person in consideration of the fact that the defendant is seriously injured by the crosswalk and the degree of damage to the victim is serious.