2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

A. Status of the parties 1) Defendant B's council of occupants' representatives (hereinafter "Defendant B's council")

2) The apartment of this case (hereinafter “the apartment of this case”) is located in Busan Seo-gu B apartment.

(2) The Plaintiff was the representative and auditor of the 16th unit of the Defendant’s council of occupants’ representatives. Defendant C was the president, Defendant D, E, and F respectively. Defendant G is the management office employee.

B. On December 15, 2011, the council of occupants' representatives held on December 15, 201 and the resolution of dismissal of the Plaintiff (hereinafter referred to as the “Plaintiff”) distributed to the Dong head of the instant apartment complex management office for five months on the ground that the Plaintiff abused the position of the auditor around December 2010, and caused the head of the instant apartment management office to dismiss the 1st floor corridor for five months. Furthermore, when the Plaintiff discovered that the 15th floor of the instant apartment complex was defective on his/her own vehicle on July 26, 2011, the Plaintiff’s dismissal resolution was approved by the resolution of dismissal of the Plaintiff (hereinafter referred to as the “15th resolution of dismissal”).

C. On the other hand, the part related to this case in the management rules of the apartment of this case (hereinafter “instant rules”) is as follows.

Article 20 (Dismissal, etc. of Representatives, etc. by Building) (1) The grounds for dismissal of the representatives and executive officers by building under Article 57 (1) 3 of the Enforcement Decree of the Housing Act shall be as follows:

1. Acts and subordinate statutes related to the management of housing and multi-family housing;