beta
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2015.07.16 2015고단94

교통사고처리특례법위반

Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is a person engaging in driving CMo5 tons, grassland, and tea trucks.

On September 1, 2014, the Defendant driven the above vehicle on September 1, 2016, and continued to drive the vehicle on a one-lane road in front of the entrance of the Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-do, Chungcheongnam-do.

There are crosswalks installed, and the bus stops are expected to pass on the right side of the crosswalk, so in such a case, the defendant engaged in driving motor vehicles has a duty of care to safely drive the motor vehicle by safely driving the motor vehicle, such as checking pedestrians and accurately operating the steering gear and brakes.

Nevertheless, due to negligence of the defendant's failure to do so, the victim D (year 26) who crosses the road from the right side to the left side of the road in the direction of the course of the defendant's movement.

As a result, the Defendant suffered from an injury to a victim’s climatic climatic climatic climatic climatic climatic climatic climatic climatic climatic climatic climatic climatic climatic climatic climatic climatic climatic climatic climatic climatic climatic climatic climatic climatic climatic climatic climatic climatic climatica

2. Grounds for dismissing the public prosecution; and

(a) Crimes of non-compliance (the main sentence of Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Article 3 (2) proviso of Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents shall not apply to traffic accidents that occur

B. Declaration that the victim does not wish to punish after the indictment of this case

(c) Judgment dismissing public prosecution (Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act);