건물명도(인도)
1. The plaintiff's appeal and the conjunctive claim added by this court are all dismissed.
2. After an appeal is filed.
1. The court's explanation as to this case is based on the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the addition of the judgment as to the plaintiff's conjunctive claim, and thus, it is consistent with the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance.
The plaintiff alleged that the lease contract of this case was renewed by the defendant's renewal request, and that the plaintiff is obligated to pay the amount of KRW 20,000,000 per annum and damages for delay from February 13, 2019. However, according to the Eul's evidence 2, the defendant deposited the amount of KRW 20,000,00 as the rent of the commercial building of this case on February 13, 2019. Thus, the plaintiff's assertion on this part is without merit.
2. Conclusion, each of the plaintiff's claims shall be dismissed as it is without merit.
The judgment of the court of first instance, which dismissed the plaintiff's claim, is just, and thus, the plaintiff's appeal and the conjunctive claim added by this court are all dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.