If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

On August 8, 1990, the defendant operated D, a seller of bank supplies in Gangnam-gu Seoul, and entered into a check contract with the new branch of the Bank of Korea under the name of the defendant, and traded household checks.

Around May 2012, the Defendant issued one copy of the check number “E”, face value “1,00,000,000”, the date of issuance “FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF

around May 2012, the Defendant issued, “F”, “F”, “2,00,00 won at the face value”, “2,00,000 won”, “the date of the issuance,” “one copy of the household check under the name of the Defendant at the new branch of the Bank of Korea and the Bank of Korea,” and “one copy of the household check under the name of the Defendant at the new branch of the Bank of Korea and the payment branch of the Bank of Korea,” respectively, around May 2012, as shown in the separate crime list (attached Form 1, the check number of 1,00,000 won is a clerical error of “F”, and the check number of 1,00,000 won is a clerical error of “G”. However, the Defendant terminated the check contract on August 2, 2012 due to the business depression and the large amount of debt,” and the Defendant paid the check at least 3,010,000 won and 1,005,01.

However, the Defendant was subject to the disposition of suspension of transaction on September 13, 2012 due to the business depression and the repayment of a large amount of debt, etc., and accordingly, the holder of the check presented a payment proposal within the period for presentment of payment.