beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2015.11.13 2015고정397

채권의공정한추심에관한법률위반

Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. Summary of the work;

A. On November 8, 2013, the primary Defendant is a creditor who holds a loan claim established by a court’s dismissal ruling against the said obligor’s subsequent appeal, with respect to a loan claim filed against D.

No debt collector shall assault, threaten, arrest, arrest, or detain a debtor or his/her related person in connection with debt collection, or commit any act of debt collection using a deceptive scheme or force against him/her, and shall commit any act of seriously impairing privacy or peace in business by repeatedly or at night, such as telephone, etc. without any justifiable ground to deliver words, letters, sound, image, or articles to the debtor or his/her related person by causing fear or apprehension.

Nevertheless, the Defendant:

1. 2014. 6. 5. 09:56경 불상의 장소에서 채무자의 처인 피해자 E의 휴대폰으로 “남편분께서 전댤하지 않았을거 같아 참고하시라 보냅니다. 이렇게 검찰에서 처분받았는데 그냥 전과자로 남으실건지”라는 내용의 문자메시지를 보낸 것을 비롯하여 협박성 문자메시지를 그만 보내라는 피해자의 말을 무시한 채 별지 범죄일람표 기재와 같이 그때부터 2014. 6. 30. 08:56경까지 합계 16회에 걸쳐 협박성 문자메시지를 피해자에게 반복적으로 전송함으로써 피해자에게 공포심이나 불안감을 유발하여 사생활 또는 업무의 평온을 심하게 해치는 행위를 하였고,

2. On June 27, 2014, at around 18:49, the said victim called the victim’s cell phone with no cell phone call, and left the voice message with the same content as that indicated in the No. 14 of the attached Table of Crimes, thereby threatening the victim to commit harm to his husband or his family.

B. The person charged with preliminary charges is fear or uneasy through the information and communications network.