1. 절도 피고인은 2018. 3. 2. 16:00 경 전주시 완산구 맏내로 147-10에 있는 숨 터 빌 앞길에서 그곳에 시정되지 않은 채 주차되어 있던 피해자 C 소유의 D 산타페 승용차를 발견하고 위 승용차의 운전석 문을 열고 물건 보관함 안에 들어 있던 현금 550만원을 가지고 가 절취하였다.

2. On March 5, 2018, the Defendant attempted to detect a Fbeer or car, a vehicle used by the official of the competent police station in Busan Metropolitan City, which was parked on the front side of the front city, at the time of the Jeonsan-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City on March 5, 2018, and open a door to drive the said car and steals the property in the said door. However, the Defendant attempted to commit a larceny by arresting a sloping G, etc. of the front city police station in the front city, where the lock was out of the lock in the flue vehicle.

Summary of Evidence

The application of the Act and subordinate statutes to the Defendant’s legal statement G in the protocol of seizure, list of seizure, and leakage of CCTV at the scene of seized objects

1. Relevant legal provisions Article 329 of the Criminal Act, Article 342 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment for a crime;

1. The grounds for sentencing under the former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Articles 38(1)2 and 50 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment of Concurrent Crimes [Scope of Recommendation] [No person who is subject to special sentencing] in the basic area (from June to one year and six months] (a person who is subject to special sentencing] (a decision of sentence] [a decision of sentence] while the defendant is under suspension of execution, and a person commits the instant crime even when a summary order is in progress for the same kind of crime, taking into account all the circumstances, such as the fact that the defendant committed the instant crime.