beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2013.07.19 2013고단673

사기

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

In fact, the Defendant did not have any particular property, and the Defendant did not receive any income from the heading “D” heading “D” heading in the old U.S. C, but did not receive any income, so even if he borrowed money from the victim E, the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to repay it, and did not actually have any intention to operate the heading.

1. On August 1, 2011, the Defendant, at G Hospital located in the Gumi-si F, concluded that “the victim did not have an operation to perform an internal surgery,” and that he/she obtained from the victim, namely, KRW 3 million from the victim, that is, he/she obtained from the victim and acquired it by deception.

2. Around August 17, 2011, the Defendant: (a) falsely stated that “The Defendant shall repay the amount of money borrowed from the president of the Host Co., Ltd. who works within the city-U.S. city-U.S. city-dong branch” to the Defendant, “on the loan of KRW 10 million in the name of the president; and (b) he/she shall directly repay to the lending company; and (c) received KRW 10,200,000 from the victim and acquired it by defrauded.”

3. On August 30, 2011, at the place indicated in paragraph (2) of this Article, the Defendant: “Around August 30, 2011, the Defendant, at the location indicated in paragraph (2), made a false statement to the victim stating that “I wish to directly operate the head of the head of the Si/Gun/Gu, but the operating fund is insufficient; Before making profits from the operation of the Gu, I fully repay all the money to the Gu, I will newly reduce the vehicle with the current NA, and I will loan the money from the vehicle.” The Defendant received KRW 10 million from the victim, thereby

4. On September 3, 2011, the Defendant, at the place specified in paragraph (2) around September 3, 2011, concluded that “the Defendant would have no money to provide a life-saving employee with a life-saving charge. The Defendant would have repaid 1.5 million won in a lump sum before lending 1.5 million won.” The Defendant, upon receiving 1.5 million won from the victim, acquired it by defrauded.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. Partial statement of the witness H in the court;

1. E, .