압류처분무효확인
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. Details of the disposition;
A. In around 196 and 1997, the Plaintiff was registered as a business operator who runs a new wholesale business under the trade name of Seongbuk-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government “C” (hereinafter “instant business establishment”).
The instant workplace was closed on June 30, 1997.
B. On April 18, 201, the Defendant seized all of the shares 3,500 shares and the rights therefrom, which the Plaintiff owned with respect to Magns Co., Ltd., as a disposition for the collection of global income tax and value-added tax (hereinafter “instant tax disposition”), as indicated below, against the Plaintiff related to the instant business establishment.
(1) On August 31, 1997, notice No. 1, 781, 370, 152, 770 value-added tax on August 17, 1998; 4,419, 603, 603, 402, 780, 780, 199, 198, 198, 200, 200, 78, 200, 78, 199, 19, 19, 19, 19, 19, 19, 19, 19, 19, 19, 19, 19, 19, 200, 780, 780, 302, 82, 380, 380, 198, 197, 19, 197, 198, 195, 198
2. Judgment on the plaintiff's assertion
A. The plaintiff asserts that the disposition of this case is unlawful due to the following reasons, and its defect is so serious as to be null and void.
1 The first argument is a new wholesale company operated from January 1, 1995 by D, and the plaintiff entered the workplace of this case around early 1995.
On April 196, D, however, was unable to file an application for business registration with the Plaintiff under his own name, and requested the Plaintiff to lend his name, which requires the certificate of personal seal impression, a certified copy of resident registration, and an identification card, and the Plaintiff.