A person who emats a dog has a duty to manage the dog completely or by preventing it from leaving the wall so that he/she does not cause any danger or injury.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this around 14:00 on May 21, 2016 and did not properly buck the wat wat to the victim C (ma, 13 years of age) who was living in front of the Defendant’s house, thereby leading the victim C (ma, 13 years of age) to approximately ten bucks.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as a dogmatic dog and a dogmatic dog, which require treatment for about three weeks.

Reasons for dismissing public prosecution, Article 266(2) of the Criminal Act, Article 327 subparag. 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act (Expression of intention not to prosecute after the institution of public prosecution)