beta
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2015.11.18 2014가합3267

손해배상(기)

Text

1. The Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) is about US$ 82,997.09 and about it from October 29, 2014 to the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff).

Reasons

A principal lawsuit and a counterclaim shall be deemed simultaneously.

Basic facts are companies that import overseas-registered brand products and supply and sell them to domestic duty-free shops, etc. The defendant is companies affiliated with the Italy Swaro Group, Awaro Group, which supply Awaro Products to Asian, Pacific countries, including brand brands and gras and glas of brands owned by the defendant.

On October 1, 2005, the Plaintiff entered into a contract under which the Defendant’s business license was transferred to the Korean duty-free shop located in Korea from the Magio Co., Ltd., and from that time, the Plaintiff supplied the Defendant’s brand, i.e., brand, Mmpoiomani, Magro (Giormani), Magro (Maxara), Magro (Maxar), Epiro, Epiro (Yves) products at a domestic duty-free shop in Korea. From October 1, 2008, the Plaintiff supplied the Defendant’s products at the domestic duty-free shop in addition to the supply of the products at the Defendant’s goods at the domestic duty-free shop and the sales of the products at the Plaintiff’s agent (hereinafter “the Defendant’s goods”). From December 2008, 201, the Plaintiff supplied judicty Crera, Kaarra brand, Mamho’s brand from December 2011 to the Plaintiff’s goods.

On July 25, 2013, the Defendant notified the termination of the instant contract after the second month. The instant contract was terminated on September 25, 2013.

[Ground of recognition] without any dispute, Gap's 1 through 9, 15, 90 certificates (including each number; hereinafter the same shall apply), the whole purport of the pleadings, and the claim for compensation by the principal agent of the lawsuit is a commercial agent who represents the sale of the product of this case supplied by the defendant, and the contract of this case was terminated due to any cause not attributable to the plaintiff, and even after the contract of the commercial agent is terminated, the defendant obtains new customers and gains significant profits due to the plaintiff's commercial agent's activities.