If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100.

The defendant is a person who operates C in Gyeong-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, and D is an employee of the above restaurant.

No person may sell or provide to juveniles drugs harmful to juveniles without compensation, even though he/she has not sold or provided them to juveniles;

1. Around 22:00 on December 18, 2015, D, an employee of the Defendant, sold to juveniles E (18 tax), F (18 tax), G (18 tax), H (18 tax), and I (17 tax) a small amount of three liquor drugs harmful to juveniles, thereby having committed an offense against the Defendant’s business as above.

2. On December 18, 2015, at around 22:30 on December 18, 2015, at the above restaurant, the Defendant sold Category 2 C, a juvenile harmful drug, to K (17), K (17), L (17), and M (17).

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the respective laws and regulations of E, F, G, H, I, J, K, L, and M;

1. Although the pertinent legal provisions on criminal facts and the indictment under Article 62 of the Act on the Protection of Juveniles who have the option of punishment stated in the indictment as “Article 61 of the Act on the Protection of Juveniles,” it is evident that it is obvious that there is any error in writing as provided in Article 6

in this chapter:

Article 59 Subparag. 6 and Article 28(1) of the Juvenile Protection Act; Article 59 Subparag. 6 and Article 28(1) of the Juvenile Protection Act; Selection of each fine

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;