2. In full view of the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant recognized the instant crime in the trial; (b) there is room to deem that the Defendant committed the instant crime intentionally without fault; (c) the Defendant’s family and employees, etc. complaining of the Defendant’s preference against the Defendant; (d) the Defendant’s family and employees, etc. are favorable to the Defendant; (b) the Defendant has not recovered from damage exceeding KRW 50 million out of the amount of damage up to the present; (c) the victim wanted to punish the Defendant; and (d) other circumstances that form the conditions for sentencing, such as the background, means, results, and conditions after the instant crime; and (e) the Defendant’s assertion is not unreasonable because the sentence of the lower court is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.