강등처분취소
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. Details of the disposition;
A. The Plaintiff was appointed as a policeman on August 29, 1992 and was promoted to the police officer on May 1, 2013 through a police officer and a slope. From February 2, 2015 to February 2, 2015, the Plaintiff was in charge of the second investigation of the Daejeon Metropolitan City Police Agency and the second investigation of the Daejeon Metropolitan City Police Agency and the “Handbling service” belonging to B (a business managing detection dogs for investigation purposes).
B. On August 6, 2015, the Daejeon Regional Police Agency General Disciplinary Committee decided to dismiss the Plaintiff for the following reasons.
On July 19, 2015, from "D cafeteria" located in Sejong City, to 17:00 to 19:00, the Plaintiff 10 bicycle club members, and from "Emaart" located in the vicinity to 23:00 to 23:23:50, the Plaintiff: (a) took the surface of the water on the vehicle after taking part of one and two-lane driver’s disease, one and two-lane driver’s disease in the table in front of "Emaart" located in the vicinity; and (b) took part of one and two-lane driver’s disease in the vehicle; and (c) took part in the water on the vehicle at around 06:44 following the following day in order to put the vehicle into drinking condition (0.044% alcohol level among blood alcohol level; and 0.053% when the Fdmark formally applied) to the signal violation, the Plaintiff violated the signal signal and caused the victim to suffer the injury of kne and kneless days.
(hereinafter referred to as "paragraph (1) of the Grounds for Disciplinary Action"), and the Plaintiff continued to commute to and from work without release a detection dog on the ground that the Plaintiff trained the detection dog from June 1, 2015. In particular, the occurrence of an accident involving drunk driving.
7. From 15:30 to 16:10 on September 19, 19: (a) used official vehicles in the “G Sports Center” located in the Daejeon Jung-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City F in the right luxization of the child’s children, and in the personal revolving lux; and (b) used official vehicles without permission for about 50 days, such as making drinking to the general public even after driving a public vehicle.
(2) The Plaintiff, as the grounds for the disciplinary action are stated in Paragraph (2) of the same Article, is related to the Plaintiff, even though he/she released a detection dog and let the Plaintiff board and lodge a vehicle for official use.