물품대금
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
The plaintiff's assertion is that the plaintiff engages in the business of selling electronic parts with the trade name of "C", and the defendant engages in the business of manufacturing electronic parts with the trade name of "D". Thus, the plaintiff supplied the defendant with the electronic parts equivalent to KRW 20,616,70 on three occasions, including KRW 5,00,00 on February 10, 2015, KRW 11,520,30 on March 13, 2015, and KRW 4,096,40 on April 10, 2015, and KRW 20,616,70 on March 10, 2015, but the defendant did not pay the goods up to now, so the claim of this case was filed.
However, the plaintiff did not provide the defendant with electronic components as above for the same period, and the plaintiff supplied processing services contracted by the defendant for the same period (the raw materials provided by E are supplied by gallon S6's gallon shape on the basis of design drawing by using press machinery, and then conducted work under a subcontract for part (the outside, the two-lane processing work) from the precise machinery, and the money the plaintiff sought in this case does not dispute between the parties who are the fact that the above secondary processing service is the price for the above secondary processing service. On the other hand, there is no dispute between the parties who are the fact that the above secondary processing service is the price for the above secondary processing service, and the purport of the whole statement and arguments of Eul through 9 (including the serial number) is added, the defendant supplied 70,000 balket from March 10, 2015 to the first part of the 2nd part of the processed work, and the plaintiff did not receive the plaintiff's compensation for damages from the above defective goods during the process.