2. The judgment of the court below seems to have seriously shocked the victim by the crime of this case, where the defendant led to the confession of the crime with no criminal history at all without criminal history, the victim does not want the punishment of the defendant, and when the defendant hedgings with the victim who was a chain, he appears to have committed contingent crimes against the victim's will, etc., or where the defendant took pictures against the victim's will against the victim's will, taking pictures of these contents against the victim's will, it seems that the mental shock of the victim suffered was very significant. In light of the circumstances of the crime, methods, results, etc., the crime is not very good in light of the above crime's circumstances, the measures taken by the defendant for the recovery of damage, and all other circumstances, such as the defendant's age, character and conduct, family relationship, environment, occupation, etc., the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.